[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Security testing: need for a security policy, and a security-critical package process



Adam Williamson (awilliam redhat com) said: 
> > > It's true, but note that the XO software is technically a "Remix"
> > > rather than a "Spin", so there aren't any technical requirements
> > > on it to satisfy the use of the Fedora mark.  (I think I'd agree
> > > with Greg's point regarding official Fedora spins.)
> > 
> > But if it was such a concern with respect to the Fedora brand and
> > image, I would think the same argument would apply, even if it
> > was just branded as a 'Fedora remix'. 
> 
> SoaS is not Fedora-branded in any way, AFAIK.

Yes, but how often have we touted XO, Sugar, et. al. as being 'based
on Fedora' over the past 4 years? Heck, you could argue it's gotten
more press than some of our official spins.

Bill


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]