[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [RFA] Your [PACKAGE_NAME] did not pass QA

Dne 24.11.2009 17:09, Jussi Lehtola napsal(a):
However, there is still a justification for legacy software. Even if
some utility only supported the ASCII code set, it would be stupid to
bar its inclusion just because it doesn't support UTF-8, as it probably
was not designed to serve that purpose.

I think you didn't get the message ... you are very welcome (well, I guess, you are) to fix packaging of those fonts (see bugs at http://is.gd/52X4m). If you say, that somebody else should do the work (I was looking at it whether I could help there, but my estimate was something like a week of full time work), then let that somebody else to decide whether it makes sense.


http://www.ceplovi.cz/matej/, Jabber: mcepl<at>ceplovi.cz
GPG Finger: 89EF 4BC6 288A BF43 1BAB  25C3 E09F EF25 D964 84AC

Ask yourself whether you’ve really obtained fullness of the Holy
Spirit, follwed by gifts needed for your service.
    -- Francis MacNutt

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]