abrt + X Error => zillions of duplicate bug reports?

[Martin Sourada]

On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 10:52 -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-11-22 at 19:21 +0100, Martin Sourada wrote:
> > So, 
> > 
> > since I've already received 3 separate bug reports caused by BadIDChoice
> > X Error in subtitleeditor [1][2][3] (haven't had enough time to debug
> > and try to fix it yet though) by abrt, I wonder if there is any room for
> > duplicity detection improvement in these cases, or if we are doomed to
> > zillions of duplicates in rhbz? (btw. otherwise abrt is awesome, IMHO
> > the bugreports from abrt are much more useful than before :-)
> 
> I know this is non-obvious, but: BadIDChoice or BadImplementation X
> errors are _always_ bugs in libX11 or the server itself, respectively.
> Please reassign BadIDChoice bugs to libX11.
> 
Thanks for the info. Bug 538382 reassigned to libX11.

Martin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20091125/ea452cc6/attachment.sig>