license issue - combining gplv2 and lgpl sources in a single rpm

[Carl Byington]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

I am packaging rasmol.

The rasmol source has a dual GPLv2/RASMOL license, so for Fedora we can
consider that it is licensed gplv2. There are some libraries that are
included that are licensed lgpl. Clearly, the finished rasmol binary is
gplv2 since the lgpl parts are statically linked into the final binary.
The final rpm does not provide separate .so files for those embedded
libraries.

I think that means that the .spec file should simply say
License: GPLv2

Is that correct?

http://www.five-ten-sg.com/rasmol.spec
http://www.five-ten-sg.com/rasmol-2.7.5-4.fc12.src.rpm

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD4DBQFLEDWvL6j7milTFsERAuuKAJ9CINOvg+n+2dZy3cIeqD0Ok529YQCXV7Xp
W2A1e7R0E9Pw3NbXXHuazA==
=1XT2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----