olpc components in x86/x86_64 repo

[Jon Ciesla]

Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 12:58 PM, Rudolf Kastl <che666 at gmail.com> wrote:
>   
>> 2009/10/6 Peter Robinson <pbrobinson at gmail.com>:
>>     
>>> On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 10:59 AM, Rudolf Kastl <che666 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>       
>>>> yum list all |grep olpc
>>>> dracut-modules-olpc.x86_64              0.2.1-2.fc12                   rawhide
>>>> olpc-contents.x86_64                    2.6-2.fc12                     rawhide
>>>> olpc-library.noarch                     2.0.2-2.fc12                   rawhide
>>>> olpc-netutils.noarch                    0.7-4.fc12                     rawhide
>>>> olpc-switch-desktop.noarch              0.6-2.fc12                     rawhide
>>>> olpc-update.noarch                      2.20-1.fc12                    rawhide
>>>> olpc-utils.x86_64                       1.0.3-2.fc12                   rawhide
>>>>
>>>> does it really make sense to have those modules available on
>>>> x86/x86_64? (this is from rawhide)
>>>>         
>>> Yes, because they are used on both x86 and x86_64 platforms. What is
>>> the problem having them there?
>>>
>>> Peter
>>>       
>> somehow i had the impression they are atleast partially related to the
>> olpc hardware.
>>     
>
> Those ones aren't necessarily, and even then why does that stop them
> from being in rawhide. There's lots of packages for specific hardware
> in Fedora and these devices run Fedora.
>
> Peter
>
>   
Additionally, having OLPC-specific RPMS in mainline Fedora helps with 
the end goal that is , as I understand it, to have OLPC's OS be 
essentially a Spin of stock Fedora.  It also helps OLPC devs who don't 
necessarily have XOs.

-- 
in your fear, seek only peace
in your fear, seek only love

-d. bowie