Bug reporting URL field in packages
James Antill
james at fedoraproject.org
Tue Oct 6 18:07:03 UTC 2009
On Tue, 2009-10-06 at 10:43 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-10-06 at 19:59 +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> > Well in that case rpm is the wrong place entirely, and ditto for respins
> > controlling their own bug report URLs. For these you'd want the bug
> > reporting URL in repodata instead: spins are creating their own
> > repositories so they can set it there, and regenerating the repodata to
> > include a new url is cheaper than rebuilding all the packages.
>
> Yeah, if you always keep track of which packages you installed from
> which repos and thus which bug system that particular package you
> installed goes to. (think of famous 3rd party repos that replace
> packages from us)
Yum already keeps track of that:
# yum list installed yum\*
Installed Packages
yum.noarch 3.2.24-9.fc12 @rawhide
yum-metadata-parser.x86_64 1.1.2-12.fc11 @fedora
yum-plugin-aliases.noarch 1.1.22-1.fc11 @updates
yum-plugin-security.noarch 1.1.22-1.fc11 @updates
yum-presto.noarch 0.5.0-1.fc11 @updates
yum-utils.noarch 1.1.22-1.fc11 @updates
yumex.noarch 2.0.5-6.fc11 @fedora
--
James Antill - james at fedoraproject.org
"I'd just like to see a realistic approach to updates via
packages." -- Les Mikesell
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list