Simplify non-responsive maintainers policy Part 2
Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
dominik at greysector.net
Thu Oct 22 08:33:23 UTC 2009
On Thursday, 22 October 2009 at 00:07, Tom Lane wrote:
> Lyos Gemini Norezel <lyos.gemininorezel at gmail.com> writes:
> > Why not just require a secondary email address?
>
> "Require" a secondary email address? Not everyone has one, or wants
> to hand it over if they do. That sounds more like a recipe for driving
> maintainers away than making sure you can contact them.
How about: Maintainers should provide a secondary e-mail address if their
primary address is supplied by their current employer.
Regards,
R.
--
Fedora http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Rathann
RPMFusion http://rpmfusion.org | MPlayer http://mplayerhq.hu
"Faith manages."
-- Delenn to Lennier in Babylon 5:"Confessions and Lamentations"
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list