RFC: proposed macro deffinitions for F-13

Dennis Gilmore dennis at ausil.us
Tue Oct 27 17:40:14 UTC 2009


Hi All,

Id like to get some feedback on the patches that i'm proposing for F-13.  
quite a few packages that need to deal with differences between 32bit/64bit  or 
multilib arches have defines for the appropriate arches.  sometimes incomplete 
since they don't include secondary arches.

I wanted to get some feedback. and see if there are other cases we should add.

Dennis
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: redhat-rpm-config-9.0.3-multilibarches.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20091027/6688a442/attachment.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: rpm-4.7.1-archdefs.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 1109 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20091027/6688a442/attachment-0001.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20091027/6688a442/attachment.sig>


More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list