status of forked zlibs in rsync and zsync

[Toshio Kuratomi]

On 09/16/2009 08:59 AM, Jochen Schmitt wrote:
> Am 16.09.2009 17:47, schrieb Toshio Kuratomi:
> 
>> That still leaves open the question of why no one has asked rsync
>> upstream to make their fork publicly available instead of hoarding
>> it as a private, internal copy.
> 
> I would ask, why the modification will not integrated in the
> 'official' Fedora zlib package?
> 
> After this integration the fedora maintainer can forward the pach to
> the upsream author.
> 
I don't know -- varekova, what do you think of the rsync-zlib patch?

http://lists.samba.org/archive/rsync/2005-December/014180.html

Does this look sane enough that you'd take it upstream?

-Toshio

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20090916/50eb8fa3/attachment.sig>