GNU libc confusion with symbols undefined.
Kevin Kofler
kevin.kofler at chello.at
Fri Sep 18 18:03:59 UTC 2009
Brown, Rodrick wrote:
> Dave so essentially @@GLIBC_2.2.5 is the symbol version set this release
> is based on? Not necessarily having anything to do with the underlying RPM
> package version? This is what I'm getting from your explanation.
Those symbols have not changed since version 2.2.5, so the symbol version is
still 2.2.5.
Kevin Kofler
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list