[Fedora-directory-devel] Does anyone has the document of performance of fedora DS ?

[Rich Megginson]

We don't have any published performance numbers or benchmarks. We're
working on putting something together. But in the meantime, I will say that
1) FDS performs good enough for any application where read/search
performance is more critical than write performance (otherwise, use an
RDBMS)
2) FDS is faster, scales better, and is more reliable than most LDAP servers
3) No LDAP server performs significantly better than FDS - in certain
cases under certain conditions, some LDAP servers perform very slightly
better, and that usually requires a lot of careful config file tuning


William.Zhang wrote:

> thanks in advance.
>ðèb‹˜j(mræj)ɨh£÷(
>
>--
>Fedora-directory-devel mailing list
>Fedora-directory-devel at redhat.com
>https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-devel
>  
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3312 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-directory-devel/attachments/20050809/fd6dbbe1/attachment.bin>