[Fedora-directory-users] What implementation of Kerberos prefered?
Rich Megginson
rmeggins at redhat.com
Thu Jun 30 17:07:11 UTC 2005
Sam Tran wrote:
>On 6/29/05, David Boreham <david_list at boreham.org> wrote:
>
>
>>Sam Tran wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>I would like to know what implementation of Kerberos is prefered to
>>>setup SASL/GESSAPI with Fedora DS: MIT or Heimdal?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>It was developed tested and is supported with MIT (or the OS vendor's
>>native krb implementation in the case of other OS'es, which I believe
>>are all derived from MIT).
>>Doesn't mean that it won't work ok with Heimdal of course.
>>
>>
>>
>
>Has anyone implemented FDS with Heimdal.
>
>Heimdal allows you to store the user passwords in LDAP. Is there a
>password change mechanism for that situation?
>
>
There is a "ldap backend" for Heimdal, but it uses the non-standard
ldapi interface (e.g. LDAP through a unix domain file based socket
rather than a TCP/IP socket). You would have to port that code to use
an ldap or ldaps interface for use with FDS.
Otherwise, I'm not sure if GSSAPI supports a password change mechanism.
If so, you could do this through FDS.
>Thanks.
>Sam
>
>--
>Fedora-directory-users mailing list
>Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com
>https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-directory-users/attachments/20050630/c3c1c443/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3312 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-directory-users/attachments/20050630/c3c1c443/attachment.bin>
More information about the Fedora-directory-users
mailing list