[Fedora-directory-users] RE: Fedora-directory-users Digest, Vol 19, Issue 3

Tue Dec 5 15:19:57 UTC 2006

t b wrote:
>> From: fedora-directory-users-request at redhat.com
>> Reply-To: fedora-directory-users at redhat.com
>> To: fedora-directory-users at redhat.com
>> Subject: Fedora-directory-users Digest, Vol 19, Issue 3
>> Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2006 12:00:05 -0500 (EST)
>>
>> Send Fedora-directory-users mailing list submissions to
>> fedora-directory-users at redhat.com
>>
>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>> fedora-directory-users-request at redhat.com
>>
>> You can reach the person managing the list at
>> fedora-directory-users-owner at redhat.com
>>
>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>> than "Re: Contents of Fedora-directory-users digest..."
>>
>>
>> Today's Topics:
>>
>> 1. Re: RE: Fedora-directory-users Digest, Vol 19, Issue 1
>> (Richard Megginson)
>> 2. Re: AD + FDS sync stops working? (To Ngan)
>> 3. Re: Memory usage (koniczynek)
>>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 1
>> Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2006 12:55:24 -0700
>> From: Richard Megginson <rmeggins at redhat.com>
>> Subject: Re: [Fedora-directory-users] RE: Fedora-directory-users
>> Digest, Vol 19, Issue 1
>> To: "General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project."
>> <fedora-directory-users at redhat.com>
>> Message-ID: <457088AC.1030004 at redhat.com>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>>
>> t b wrote:
>> > My logs seem to indicate that the connection is being encrypted; I can
>> > ssh to a client server and get the password prompt, but when I enter
>> > the password it just returns me to the password prompt again
>> >
>> > [01/Dec/2006:19:47:44 -0500] conn=650 fd=69 slot=69 connection from
>> > xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx to xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
>> > [01/Dec/2006:19:47:44 -0500] conn=650 op=0 EXT
>> > oid="1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.20037" name="startTLS"
>> > [01/Dec/2006:19:47:44 -0500] conn=650 op=0 RESULT err=0 tag=120
>> > nentries=0 etime=0
>> > [01/Dec/2006:19:47:44 -0500] conn=650 SSL 256-bit AES
>> All of this means the client was able to successfully perform the
>> startTLS extended operation and start using SSL.
>> > [01/Dec/2006:19:47:44 -0500] conn=650 op=1 UNBIND
>> > [01/Dec/2006:19:47:44 -0500] conn=650 op=1 fd=69 closed - U1
>> The UNBIND means the client had a problem and closed the connection.
>> Does the client print any errors? Are there any messages in the server
>> error log?
>
> On the client server it show,
>
> sshd[24149]: Failed password for invalid user xxxxx from 
> xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx port xxx ssh2
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>> >
>> > If I disable TLS everything works fine, the client server can query
>> > the FDS and auth the client properly
>> >
>> > I am not sure if the problem has to do with the pam_ldap not properly
>> > formatted or the cert file not in proper format
>> >
>> > Does anyone have an example of what the pam_ldap config should look
>> > like? or suggestions on checking whether the cert file is in proper
>> > format
>> I'm not sure. PAM needs the ca cert of the CA that issued the directory
>> server server cert. See
>> http://directory.fedora.redhat.com/wiki/Howto:SSL for more information.
>> >
>
> That was the info I used to do the SSL setup, but I only see a part of 
> the log output they indicated,
>
> Their logs,
>
> [18/Jul/2005:20:33:36 -0400] conn=4 op=0 EXT 
> oid="1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.20037" name="startTLS"
> [18/Jul/2005:20:33:36 -0400] conn=4 op=0 RESULT err=0 tag=120 
> nentries=0 etime=0
> [18/Jul/2005:20:33:36 -0400] conn=4 SSL 256-bit AES
> [18/Jul/2005:20:33:36 -0400] conn=4 op=1 BIND dn="" method=128 version=3
> [18/Jul/2005:20:33:36 -0400] conn=4 op=1 RESULT err=0 tag=97 
> nentries=0 etime=0 dn=""
> [18/Jul/2005:20:33:36 -0400] conn=4 op=2 SRCH base="dc=example,dc=com" 
> scope=2 filter="(uid=testuser)" attrs=ALL
>
> My Logs,
>
> [04/Dec/2006:14:35:52 -0500] conn=757 op=0 EXT 
> oid="1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.20037" name="startTLS"
> [04/Dec/2006:14:35:52 -0500] conn=757 op=0 RESULT err=0 tag=120 
> nentries=0 etime=0
> [04/Dec/2006:14:35:52 -0500] conn=757 SSL 256-bit AES
> [04/Dec/2006:14:35:52 -0500] conn=757 op=1 UNBIND
> [04/Dec/2006:14:35:52 -0500] conn=757 op=1 fd=71 closed - U1
>
> For some reason my setup dies just before querying the FDS to 
> determine user details
>
> Do you know of any tests that I can run just on the client server to 
> determine proper confuguration?
Firstly, try /usr/bin/ldapsearch to see if you can use startTLS and bind 
as your user.
>
>
>
>
>
>> > Also what's the UNBIND shown in the logs?
>> >
>> > Thanks
>> >
>> >> From: fedora-directory-users-request at redhat.com
>> >> Reply-To: fedora-directory-users at redhat.com
>> >> To: fedora-directory-users at redhat.com
>> >> Subject: Fedora-directory-users Digest, Vol 19, Issue 1
>> >> Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 12:00:06 -0500 (EST)
>> >>
>> >> Send Fedora-directory-users mailing list submissions to
>> >> fedora-directory-users at redhat.com
>> >>
>> >> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>> >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
>> >> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>> >> fedora-directory-users-request at redhat.com
>> >>
>> >> You can reach the person managing the list at
>> >> fedora-directory-users-owner at redhat.com
>> >>
>> >> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>> >> than "Re: Contents of Fedora-directory-users digest..."
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Today's Topics:
>> >>
>> >> 1. pam_ldap with SSL/TLS (t b)
>> >> 2. RE: pam_ldap with SSL/TLS (Morris, Patrick)
>> >> 3. Re: pam_ldap with SSL/TLS (Richard Megginson)
>> >> 4. Problem with SSL console in X in specific circumstances
>> >> (Philip Kime)
>> >> 5. FW: [Fedora-directory-users] Extracting details from
>> >> ActiveDirectoryto FDS (Paxton, Darren)
>> >> 6. alias in fedora directory server (patrick ndjientcheu ngandjui)
>> >> 7. Re: FW: [Fedora-directory-users] Extracting details from
>> >> ActiveDirectoryto FDS (Nicholas Byrne)
>> >> 8. Re: Memory usage (koniczynek)
>> >> 9. Re: Memory usage (David Boreham)
>> >> 10. Re: Memory usage (koniczynek)
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> 
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >>
>> >> Message: 1
>> >> Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 12:31:50 -0500
>> >> From: "t b" <mxheadroom at hotmail.com>
>> >> Subject: [Fedora-directory-users] pam_ldap with SSL/TLS
>> >> To: fedora-directory-users at redhat.com
>> >> Message-ID: <BAY116-F322745E96D702ED748B1D0CDDB0 at phx.gbl>
>> >> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
>> >>
>> >> I am trying to setup pam_ldap to use TLS to communicate with the FDS,
>> >> but
>> >> having lots of problems doing so; it works if I use the unencrypted
>> >> way but
>> >> not if I use ldaps ( port 636 )
>> >>
>> >> I used the instructions at,
>> >> http://directory.fedora.redhat.com/wiki/Howto:PAM
>> >>
>> >> Has anyone gotten PAM to work TLS
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Thanks
>> >>
>> >> _________________________________________________________________
>> >> Buy, Load, Play. The new Sympatico / MSN Music Store works seamlessly
>> >> with
>> >> Windows Media Player. Just Click PLAY.
>> >> 
>> http://musicstore.sympatico.msn.ca/content/viewer.aspx?cid=SMS_Sept192006 
>>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> ------------------------------
>> >>
>> >> Message: 2
>> >> Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 13:00:56 -0500
>> >> From: "Morris, Patrick" <patrick.morris at hp.com>
>> >> Subject: RE: [Fedora-directory-users] pam_ldap with SSL/TLS
>> >> To: "General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server 
>> project."
>> >> <fedora-directory-users at redhat.com>
>> >> Message-ID:
>> >> 
>> <CD18C81835E18A40A64C4A0D16A237BE05FE850D at ATAEXC01.americas.cpqcorp.net>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
>> >>
>> >> > I am trying to setup pam_ldap to use TLS to communicate with
>> >> > the FDS, but having lots of problems doing so; it works if I
>> >> > use the unencrypted way but not if I use ldaps ( port 636 )
>> >>
>> >> Someone should jump in here and correct me if I'm wrong, but I 
>> believe
>> >> it's normal for TLS connections to happen on the standard LDAP port.
>> >> You should be able to tell from your logs whether the connection is
>> >> encrypted or not.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> ------------------------------
>> >>
>> >> Message: 3
>> >> Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 11:08:08 -0700
>> >> From: Richard Megginson <rmeggins at redhat.com>
>> >> Subject: Re: [Fedora-directory-users] pam_ldap with SSL/TLS
>> >> To: "General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server 
>> project."
>> >> <fedora-directory-users at redhat.com>
>> >> Message-ID: <456F1E08.40601 at redhat.com>
>> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>> >>
>> >> Morris, Patrick wrote:
>> >> >> I am trying to setup pam_ldap to use TLS to communicate with
>> >> >> the FDS, but having lots of problems doing so; it works if I
>> >> >> use the unencrypted way but not if I use ldaps ( port 636 )
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >> > Someone should jump in here and correct me if I'm wrong, but I 
>> believe
>> >> > it's normal for TLS connections to happen on the standard LDAP 
>> port.
>> >> > You should be able to tell from your logs whether the connection is
>> >> > encrypted or not.
>> >> >
>> >> Yes. The LDAP "preferred" way is to use the startTLS extended 
>> operation
>> >> which starts a TLS session on the non-secure port. This will be 
>> logged
>> >> in the access log.
>> >> > --
>> >> > Fedora-directory-users mailing list
>> >> > Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com
>> >> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
>> >> >
>> >> -------------- next part --------------
>> >> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
>> >> Name: smime.p7s
>> >> Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
>> >> Size: 3178 bytes
>> >> Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
>> >> Url :
>> >> 
>> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-directory-users/attachments/20061130/0634e78a/smime.bin 
>>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> ------------------------------
>> >>
>> >> Message: 4
>> >> Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 18:02:55 -0800
>> >> From: "Philip Kime" <pkime at Shopzilla.com>
>> >> Subject: [Fedora-directory-users] Problem with SSL console in X in
>> >> specific circumstances
>> >> To: <fedora-directory-users at redhat.com>
>> >> Message-ID:
>> >> <9C0091F428E697439E7A773FFD083427435BE3 at szexchange.Shopzilla.inc>
>> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>> >>
>> >> Here's the problem:
>> >>
>> >> Running startconsole (SSL) to a remote display on a PC X-server 
>> (xwin32)
>> >> works fine and requires that my windows home dir on the PC X-server
>> >> machine has .fedora-console/ containing cert8.db and key3.db, as 
>> you'd
>> >> expect. If I rename this dir, the console hangs at the splash 
>> screen. So
>> >> far, so good, all makes sense.
>> >>
>> >> If I try the same thing to cygwin's X server on same machine or to 
>> an X
>> >> server on a Mac running OSX, startconsole always hangs as if it can't
>> >> find ~/.fedora-console on the local machine. I've tried copying 
>> this dir
>> >> to what cygwin/OSX thinks is the user's home dir but no luck. Where
>> >> should I put the Cert db files under "real" UNIX X to get the SSL
>> >> console to work? Also tried ~/.mmc as per the docs but I could 
>> never get
>> >> this to work.
>> >>
>> >> PK
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Philip Kime
>> >> NOPS Systems Architect
>> >> 310 401 0407
>> >>
>> >> -------------- next part --------------
>> >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> >> URL:
>> >> 
>> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-directory-users/attachments/20061130/054ecbd6/attachment.html 
>>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> ------------------------------
>> >>
>> >> Message: 5
>> >> Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 08:04:30 -0000
>> >> From: "Paxton, Darren" <Darren.Paxton at mercer.com>
>> >> Subject: FW: [Fedora-directory-users] Extracting details from
>> >> ActiveDirectoryto FDS
>> >> To: <Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com>
>> >> Message-ID:
>> >> <52F7C07B119CF4439B7EFBFE0FB3256B027CBD02 at eidwpexms06.mercer.com>
>> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>> >>
>> >> Skipped content of type multipart/alternative-------------- next part
>> >> --------------
>> >> --
>> >> Fedora-directory-users mailing list
>> >> Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com
>> >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
>> >>
>> >> ------------------------------
>> >>
>> >> Message: 6
>> >> Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 08:10:42 +0000 (GMT)
>> >> From: patrick ndjientcheu ngandjui <tchen_pat at yahoo.fr>
>> >> Subject: [Fedora-directory-users] alias in fedora directory server
>> >> To: Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com
>> >> Message-ID: <20061201081042.78578.qmail at web25801.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
>> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>> >>
>> >> Hi,
>> >> I would like to know how to use alias in fedora directory server.It
>> >> seems that it is used for point to another entry in the directory,but
>> >> i don't know how to use this feature.May someone helps me on this
>> >> issue? I would really appreciate an example.
>> >>
>> >> Thanks
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> 
>> ___________________________________________________________________________ 
>>
>> >>
>> >> Découvrez une nouvelle façon d'obtenir des réponses à toutes vos
>> >> questions !
>> >> Profitez des connaissances, des opinions et des expériences des
>> >> internautes sur Yahoo! Questions/Réponses
>> >> http://fr.answers.yahoo.com
>> >> -------------- next part --------------
>> >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> >> URL:
>> >> 
>> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-directory-users/attachments/20061201/0fa54e4f/attachment.html 
>>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> ------------------------------
>> >>
>> >> Message: 7
>> >> Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2006 11:50:13 +0000
>> >> From: Nicholas Byrne <nicholas.byrne at quadriga.com>
>> >> Subject: Re: FW: [Fedora-directory-users] Extracting details from
>> >> ActiveDirectoryto FDS
>> >> To: "General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server 
>> project."
>> >> <fedora-directory-users at redhat.com>
>> >> Message-ID: <457016F5.5030202 at quadriga.com>
>> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>> >>
>> >> Your messages got through - you can confirm by checking the 
>> archives -
>> >> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-directory-users/
>> >>
>> >> I'm a new user as well so i'm afraid i can't answer your question, 
>> but
>> >> if you keep asking i'm sure someone will know!
>> >> Nick
>> >>
>> >> Paxton, Darren wrote:
>> >> > Apologies for mailing yet again, however either my messages are not
>> >> > getting through (something I don't believe as I keep getting the 
>> post
>> >> > to the mailing list) - or for some reason, no one is willing to 
>> even
>> >> > acknowledge my issue.
>> >> >
>> >> > In the spirit of the community - can someone at least acknowledge a
>> >> > message as I find it quite disheartening that I have had no 
>> replies at
>> >> > all even if just to point me somewhere for assistance.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> 
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> > *From:* fedora-directory-users-bounces at redhat.com
>> >> > [mailto:fedora-directory-users-bounces at redhat.com] *On Behalf Of
>> >> > *Paxton, Darren
>> >> > *Sent:* 30 November 2006 08:46
>> >> > *To:* General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server 
>> project.
>> >> > *Subject:* RE: [Fedora-directory-users] Extracting details from
>> >> > ActiveDirectoryto FDS
>> >> >
>> >> > Hi
>> >> >
>> >> > Has anyone had any thoughts on my query or can point me in the 
>> right
>> >> > direction?
>> >> >
>> >> > As is the nature of AD, I would have thought it is possible to 
>> extract
>> >> > this information using a scope setting or something similar.
>> >> >
>> >> > Thanks
>> >> >
>> >> > Darren
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> 
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> > *From:* fedora-directory-users-bounces at redhat.com
>> >> > [mailto:fedora-directory-users-bounces at redhat.com] *On Behalf Of
>> >> > *Paxton, Darren
>> >> > *Sent:* 24 November 2006 14:56
>> >> > *To:* fedora-directory-users at redhat.com
>> >> > *Subject:* [Fedora-directory-users] Extracting details from Active
>> >> > Directoryto FDS
>> >> >
>> >> > Hi all,
>> >> >
>> >> > I've been tinkering with integrating our Linux devices into our AD
>> >> > domain for some time and I've hit a few brick walls, however I've
>> >> > recently discovered FDS and the synchronisation features with AD.
>> >> >
>> >> > I've managed to set up a few replication jobs, however due to the
>> >> > extensive nature of our AD, I've realised that the sync only takes
>> >> > the group and user objects from the OU or CN being specified.
>> >> >
>> >> > Is there any way I can specify that it should traverse all
>> >> > subtrees of an OU and extract all that information back into FDS?
>> >> >
>> >> > Thanks
>> >> >
>> >> > Darren
>> >> >
>> >> > --
>> >> > Darren Paxton
>> >> > EMEA Tier2
>> >> > Red Hat Certified Engineer
>> >> > VMware Certified Professional
>> >> > MGTI Centralised ops
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > This e-mail and any attachments may be confidential or legally
>> >> > privileged.If you received this message in error or are not the
>> >> > intended recipient, you should destroy the email message and any
>> >> > attachments or copies, and you are prohibited from retaining,
>> >> > distributing, disclosing or using any information contained herein.
>> >> > Please inform us of the erroneous delivery by return e-mail. 
>> Thank you
>> >> > for your co-operation.
>> >> >
>> >> > Mercer Human Resource Consulting Limited is authorised and 
>> regulated
>> >> > by the Financial Services Authority. Registered in England No. 
>> 984275.
>> >> > Registered Office: 1 Tower Place West, Tower Place, London, EC3R 
>> 5BU.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> 
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> >
>> >> > --
>> >> > Fedora-directory-users mailing list
>> >> > Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com
>> >> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> 
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> >
>> >> > --
>> >> > Fedora-directory-users mailing list
>> >> > Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com
>> >> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> This e-mail is the property of Quadriga Worldwide Ltd, intended for
>> >> the addressee only and confidential. Any dissemination, copying or
>> >> distribution of this message or any attachments is strictly 
>> prohibited.
>> >>
>> >> If you have received this message in error, please notify us
>> >> immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your
>> >> computer.
>> >>
>> >> Messages sent to and from Quadriga may be monitored.
>> >>
>> >> Quadriga cannot guarantee any message delivery method is secure or
>> >> error-free. Information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost,
>> >> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>> >>
>> >> We do not accept responsibility for any errors or omissions in this
>> >> message and/or attachment that arise as a result of transmission.
>> >>
>> >> You should carry out your own virus checks before opening any
>> >> attachment.
>> >>
>> >> Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do
>> >> not necessarily represent those of Quadriga.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> ------------------------------
>> >>
>> >> Message: 8
>> >> Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2006 16:45:28 +0100
>> >> From: koniczynek <koniczynek at uaznia.net>
>> >> Subject: Re: [Fedora-directory-users] Memory usage
>> >> To: "General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server 
>> project."
>> >> <fedora-directory-users at redhat.com>
>> >> Message-ID: <45704E18.3070705 at uaznia.net>
>> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed
>> >>
>> >> Richard Megginson napisa³(a):
>> >> > This is an excellent cache/memory tuning document from a Sun 
>> employee,
>> >> > primarily targeted to Sun DS users, but almost all of the
>> >> information is
>> >> > relevant to Fedora DS (since they share a common lineage).
>> >> >
>> >> > http://www.directorymanager.org/blogs/ds_cache_sizing.pdf
>> >> Lets say I heven't got much time lately so without thinking I've 
>> changed
>> >> in dse.ldif
>> >> nsslapd-import-cache-autosize from -1 to 1 and after restarting I've
>> >> started to receive errors like: "3 Time limit exceeded" Someone do 
>> know
>> >> what to do? ;)
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> xmpp/email: koniczynek at uaznia.net
>> >> xmpp/email: koniczynek at gmail.com
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> ------------------------------
>> >>
>> >> Message: 9
>> >> Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2006 09:15:14 -0700
>> >> From: David Boreham <david_list at boreham.org>
>> >> Subject: Re: [Fedora-directory-users] Memory usage
>> >> To: "General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server 
>> project."
>> >> <fedora-directory-users at redhat.com>
>> >> Message-ID: <45705512.4070808 at boreham.org>
>> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed
>> >>
>> >> koniczynek wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > Richard Megginson napisa³(a):
>> >> >
>> >> >> This is an excellent cache/memory tuning document from a Sun
>> >> >> employee, primarily targeted to Sun DS users, but almost all of 
>> the
>> >> >> information is relevant to Fedora DS (since they share a common
>> >> >> lineage).
>> >> >>
>> >> >> http://www.directorymanager.org/blogs/ds_cache_sizing.pdf
>> >> >
>> >> > Lets say I heven't got much time lately so without thinking I've
>> >> > changed in dse.ldif
>> >> > nsslapd-import-cache-autosize from -1 to 1 and after restarting 
>> I've
>> >> > started to receive errors like: "3 Time limit exceeded" Someone do
>> >> > know what to do? ;)
>> >> >
>> >> Change it back ?
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> ------------------------------
>> >>
>> >> Message: 10
>> >> Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2006 17:53:22 +0100
>> >> From: koniczynek <koniczynek at uaznia.net>
>> >> Subject: Re: [Fedora-directory-users] Memory usage
>> >> To: "General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server 
>> project."
>> >> <fedora-directory-users at redhat.com>
>> >> Message-ID: <45705E02.7020709 at uaznia.net>
>> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2
>> >>
>> >> David Boreham, dnia 2006-12-01 17:15 napisal:
>> >> >> Lets say I heven't got much time lately so without thinking I've
>> >> >> changed in dse.ldif
>> >> >> nsslapd-import-cache-autosize from -1 to 1 and after restarting 
>> I've
>> >> >> started to receive errors like: "3 Time limit exceeded" Someone do
>> >> >> know what to do? ;)
>> >> > Change it back ?
>> >> man, please, show some respect ;) I did change it back, but to no 
>> avail.
>> >> Also I can say (to stop further questions): yes, I've stopped the 
>> server
>> >> before change.
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> email/xmpp: koniczynek at uaznia.net
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> ------------------------------
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Fedora-directory-users mailing list
>> >> Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com
>> >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> End of Fedora-directory-users Digest, Vol 19, Issue 1
>> >> *****************************************************
>> >
>> > _________________________________________________________________
>> > Off to school, going on a trip, or moving? Windows Live (MSN)
>> > Messenger lets you stay in touch with friends and family wherever you
>> > go. Click here to find out how to sign up!
>> > http://www.telusmobility.com/msnxbox/
>> >
>> > --
>> > Fedora-directory-users mailing list
>> > Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com
>> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
>> -------------- next part --------------
>> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
>> Name: smime.p7s
>> Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
>> Size: 3178 bytes
>> Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
>> Url : 
>> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-directory-users/attachments/20061201/7d15c5b4/smime.bin 
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 2
>> Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2006 15:23:28 -0800
>> From: To Ngan <tngan at redhat.com>
>> Subject: Re: [Fedora-directory-users] AD + FDS sync stops working?
>> To: "General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project."
>> <fedora-directory-users at redhat.com>
>> Message-ID: <4570B970.3070901 at redhat.com>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
>>
>> Dan Oglesby wrote:
>> > I tried the following:
>> >
>> > In windows registry->HKLM->Software->PasswordSync, try add string 
>> value “Log
>> > Level” and set it to “1”. Restart the passsync service. This should 
>> log
>> > all transactions and errors. Turn this back to "0" and restart 
>> passsync
>> > after troubleshooting.
>> >
>> > All I see in the log is this:
>> >
>> > 11/30/06 09:12:58: begin log
>> > 11/30/06 09:12:59: 0 new entries loaded from file
>> > 11/30/06 09:14:20: 0 new entries loaded from file
>> > 11/30/06 09:14:20: 0 entries saved to file
>> > 11/30/06 09:14:20: end log
>> > 11/30/06 09:14:22: begin log
>> > 11/30/06 09:14:22: 0 new entries loaded from file
>> >
>> > That’s after restarting the passsync service twice, and changing a 
>> user’s
>> > password in AD four times.
>> >
>>
>> Hmm... 2 Windows sync stopped working together after 6 months. Any cert
>> on AD or DS side expired?
>> -- 
>> toto
>>
>> -------------- next part --------------
>> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
>> Name: smime.p7s
>> Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
>> Size: 3233 bytes
>> Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
>> Url : 
>> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-directory-users/attachments/20061201/b9f1ea83/smime.bin 
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 3
>> Date: Sat, 02 Dec 2006 09:28:17 +0100
>> From: koniczynek <koniczynek at uaznia.net>
>> Subject: Re: [Fedora-directory-users] Memory usage
>> To: "General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project."
>> <fedora-directory-users at redhat.com>
>> Message-ID: <45713921.1080009 at uaznia.net>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2
>>
>> Richard Megginson, dnia 2006-12-01 18:00 napisal:
>> >> man, please, show some respect ;) I did change it back, but to no 
>> avail.
>> >> Also I can say (to stop further questions): yes, I've stopped the 
>> server
>> >> before change.
>> >>
>> > What types of searches are returning time limit exceeded? Can you post
>> > relevant excerpts from the access and error logs?
>> I'm "benchmarking" my FDS with "ldapsearch -x" and earlier it worked and
>> now it does not. In error logs there were "err=3" but I don't remember
>> much more and I'll have access to the logs on Monday, so till then, only
>> I can provide only this information (because I do not remember anything
>> more ;) )
>>
>> -- 
>> email/xmpp: koniczynek at uaznia.net
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> -- 
>> Fedora-directory-users mailing list
>> Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
>>
>>
>> End of Fedora-directory-users Digest, Vol 19, Issue 3
>> *****************************************************
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Off to school, going on a trip, or moving? Windows Live (MSN) 
> Messenger lets you stay in touch with friends and family wherever you 
> go. Click here to find out how to sign up! 
> http://www.telusmobility.com/msnxbox/
>
> -- 
> Fedora-directory-users mailing list
> Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3245 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-directory-users/attachments/20061205/ab1314e2/attachment.bin>