[Fedora-directory-users] fds vs. samba4?

[Nikos Zaharioudakis]

On 1/25/06, Les Mikesell <les at futuresource.com> wrote:
> Is anyone following the Active Directory services in samba4
> (http://www.zdnet.com.au/news/software/soa/New_Samba_targets_Active_Directory/0,2000061733,39234687,00.htm)
> enough to comment on how it would compare to FDS for network
> authentication purposes?
>
> --
>  Les Mikesell
>    lesmikesell at gmail.com
>
>
> --
> Fedora-directory-users mailing list
> Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
>

Well at least I think you could still use FDS as a meta directory
server that has to play with a M$ ADS. On the other hand SMB 4
features a new mini ldap inside, let alone the kerberos. So ther are
chances you could play that way too. Please list correct me if I am
stupid.;-)
--
########################################3
Zaharioudakis Nikos
mob: +30 6947204063
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?