[Fedora-directory-users] Re: Another segfault ...

[Richard Megginson]

Philip Kime wrote:
>> No.  Can you post the last few lines from your errors and access logs?
>>     
>
> Well, part of the problem is that this server gets so hammered - 99.9%
> CPU devoted to nslapd all the time, that the access logs roll over so
> quickly, I don't have them any more. According to the FDSgraph charts
> (which are messed up because I think it's so busy, the graphs are just a
> patchwork of points which aren't joined up),
Ok.  Then, how about the error log?
> it does about 70k ops per
> minutes, peaking at about 140k.
What are the clients?  OS login?
> This suddenly shot up a few weeks ago
> and nobody seems to know why so I'm assuming that the load is the
> problem. I was thinking about increasing the mem cache for FDS - worth
> trying? It seems to be at the default (10 Meg?) and this box has easily
> 3Gb doing nothing at any one time.
>   
The mem cache should only be large enough to hold all of the 
entries/indexes in your database - any more than that is not used.  You 
could try increasing it, but I doubt it will help.
> PK
>
> --
> Fedora-directory-users mailing list
> Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
>   
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3245 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-directory-users/attachments/20070404/ded2e2e9/attachment.bin>