[Fedora-directory-users] An index for the server-side sort functionality
Rich Megginson
rmeggins at redhat.com
Tue Dec 9 15:54:32 UTC 2008
Andrey Ivanov wrote:
>
>
> 2008/12/9 Rich Megginson <rmeggins at redhat.com
> <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com>>
>
> Andrey Ivanov wrote:
>
> Tuesday, December 9, 2008, 4:26:08 PM, you wrote:
>
> RM> Andrey Ivanov wrote:
>
>
> There is a special type of indexing for the VLV sort
> searches but I have
> not found what sort of index I should create to make
> the server-side sort
> on a certain attribute optimized.
>
>
> RM> I think each attribute you want to sort by must be indexed
> for equality.
> No, it does not seem to be sufficient. I have activated all the
> indexes for the attribute (sn), the logs still show "notes=U" :
>
> [09/Dec/2008:16:36:38 +0100] conn=3817 op=3 RESULT err=0
> tag=101 nentries=40 etime=0.004000 notes=U
>
> ...
>
> Maybe there is a special type of index for server-side sorting
> like
> the one for the VLV?
>
>
> No.
> Do you have any problems if you search on those attributes without
> server side sorting?
>
>
> No, not really. It's more a request from our developers to simplify
> user sorting in their web applications.
>
> If i make the same search without the sorting the result is shown as
> indexed (no "notes=U") and takes two times less time :
>
> [09/Dec/2008:16:48:58 +0100] conn=3821 op=3 RESULT err=0 tag=101
> nentries=40 etime=0.002000
It's exactly the same search? Same base, scope, and filter?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3258 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-directory-users/attachments/20081209/b4ce2c98/attachment.bin>
More information about the Fedora-directory-users
mailing list