[Fedora-directory-users] Re: SYNC without password ...

Rich Megginson rmeggins at redhat.com
Tue Oct 21 01:41:30 UTC 2008


Vipul Ramani wrote:
>
>  already enabled  8192 log-level !!!  ...
>
> And what does it mean 640-bit does not supported - does mean  FDS 
> community wont be able to support or PassSyn not work at all !!! Can 
> you please explain ...
That means we don't have a 64-bit Windows development environment with 
which to develop and test 64-bit winsync.  AFAIK, the code is 64-bit 
clean - it just needs to be built and tested.
>
> do u know any other piece of code which will replace PassSync and i 
> can come out of this  64-bit limitation ???
No, not that I know of.
>
>  
>
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 4:01 PM, Vipul Ramani <vipulramani at gmail.com 
> <mailto:vipulramani at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>
>
>     Yes i am using simple authentication  .  NOT SSL based client auth ..
>
>     Any plans for PassSyn Support for 64 - bit OS ???
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>     -- 
>     Regards
>
>     Vipul Ramani
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Regards
>
> Vipul Ramani
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> --
> Fedora-directory-users mailing list
> Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
>   

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3258 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-directory-users/attachments/20081020/5665df4c/attachment.bin>


More information about the Fedora-directory-users mailing list