[389-users] Single Master, Multiple Slave with NO Configuration Server Question

Vince Tingey vtingey at msl.ubc.ca
Mon Jun 29 15:42:22 UTC 2009


Hi everyone,  I posted this last week but nobody replied.  I thought I 
would send it out there one more time as I'd really like to know what 
you experts think.  The documentation about what benefits using a 
configuration server gives you is lacking.

Just wondering if there are any problems I should be aware of if I want 
to setup a single master multiple slave scenario WITHOUT using the 
master as a configuration server and just replicating our directory 
database (not o=Netscape Root).  I'm ok having to connect to the slave 
admin servers individually instead of them all showing up in the console 
when I connect to the master admin server.  Are there any other drawbacks? 

What are the benefits of using a configuration server in this scenario?

Thank you,

-- 

Vince                   |  Michael Smith Laboratories
IT Systems Coordinator  |  University of British Columbia

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-directory-users/attachments/20090629/dae773b1/attachment.htm>


More information about the Fedora-directory-users mailing list