[389-users] Single Master, Multiple Slave with NO Configuration Server Question
Vince Tingey
vtingey at msl.ubc.ca
Mon Jun 29 15:42:22 UTC 2009
Hi everyone, I posted this last week but nobody replied. I thought I
would send it out there one more time as I'd really like to know what
you experts think. The documentation about what benefits using a
configuration server gives you is lacking.
Just wondering if there are any problems I should be aware of if I want
to setup a single master multiple slave scenario WITHOUT using the
master as a configuration server and just replicating our directory
database (not o=Netscape Root). I'm ok having to connect to the slave
admin servers individually instead of them all showing up in the console
when I connect to the master admin server. Are there any other drawbacks?
What are the benefits of using a configuration server in this scenario?
Thank you,
--
Vince | Michael Smith Laboratories
IT Systems Coordinator | University of British Columbia
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-directory-users/attachments/20090629/dae773b1/attachment.htm>
More information about the Fedora-directory-users
mailing list