[389-users] memberOf task problem

Andrey Ivanov andrey.ivanov at polytechnique.fr
Thu May 21 10:59:54 UTC 2009


Hi,

there are two things to be verified and/or taken into account:
* the pair of the attributes that is maintained (the arguments
"memberofgroupattr" and "memberofattr" of the plug-in)
* presence of these two attributes in the classes of your users and groups

To find fixup-memberof.pl try "locate fixup-memberof.pl".

To launch it manually  you need to add something like that to the server
(with ldapmodify) :
dn: cn=memberOf_fixup_2009_5_21_12_39_21, cn=memberOf task, cn=tasks,
cn=config
changetype: add
objectclass: top
objectclass: extensibleObject
cn: memberOf_fixup_2009_5_21_12_39_21
basedn: dc=example,dc=com
filter: (objectClass=inetOrgPerson)


As for your account, you may remove/add yourself from a group to see if it
changes the memberof attribute. Verify the objectClass of your entry and
make sure the attribute memberOf is an optional attribute of at least one of
these objectClasses...



2009/5/21 John A. Sullivan III <jsullivan at opensourcedevel.com>

> Hello, all.  We are in the process of upgrading from 8.0 to 8.1.  We've
> hit a few glitches along the way but most has gone well.  However, we
> wanted to implement the new memberOf functionality.  We successfully
> added the plugin by editing dse.ldif and enabled it from the console.
> However, we've been unsuccessful in having existing group membership
> assigned to the memberOf attribute.
>
> We first tried to run fixup-memberOf.pl but the script does not exist.
> There is a template.fixup-memberOf.pl but this does not seem to have
> been built into a final script.
>
> We then thought we would use the new task feature of the console.  We
> went to cn=memberof task,cn=tasks,cn=config and tried to create the task
> object.  There was no nsDirectoryServerTask objectclass.  We added an
> nstask but then found there was no basedn attribute we could add.  We
> then created an extensibleobject instead but still not basedn attribute.
>
> Finally, we resorted to ldapmodify (we hesitated just because we are not
> very familiar with the command line tools).  First, we did:
>
> dn: cn=fixMemberOf,cn=memberof task,cn=tasks,cn=config
> changetype: add
> objectclass: top
> objectclass: extensibleObject
> cn: fixMemberOf
> basedn: o=Internal,dc=ssiservices,dc=biz
>
> The Internal Organization has several organizations under it (for
> various clients) and then user organizational units under those
> organizations.  Although it generated no errors, it did not seem to
> work.  Perhaps I just don't know how to test it.  However, the following
> did not return an memberOf data:
>
> /usr/lib64/mozldap/ldapsearch -b
> "ou=Users,o=client1,o=Internal,dc=ssiservices,dc=biz" -D "cn=Directory
> Manager" -w - -h ldap uid=myid memberOf
>
> Doing /usr/lib64/mozldap/ldapsearch -b
> "ou=Users,o=client1,o=Internal,dc=ssiservices,dc=biz" -D "cn=Directory
> Manager" -w - -h ldap uid=myid
> showed me plenty of attributes but nothing for memberOf
>
> I also tried creating the task with a basedn of
> ou=Users,o=client1,o=Internal,dc=ssiservices,dc=biz in case it did not
> change objects lower in the tree.  Still no success.
>
> Finally I tried:
>
> dn: cn=fixMemberOf,cn=memberof task,cn=tasks,cn=config
> changetype: add
> objectclass: top
> objectclass: nsDirectoryServerTask
> cn: fixMemberOf
> basedn: o=Internal,dc=ssiservices,dc=biz
>
> adding new entry cn=fixMemberOf,cn=memberof task,cn=tasks,cn=config
> ldap_add: Object class violation
> ldap_add: additional info: unknown object class "nsDirectoryServerTask"
>
> And received the expected unknown object class error.
>
> What are we doing wrong? Are these documentation bugs? Are there
> application bugs or do we simply not know what we are doing with tasks
> and memberOf? How do we get the memberOf information into our existing
> user objects? Thanks - John
>
>
> --
> John A. Sullivan III
> Open Source Development Corporation
> +1 207-985-7880
> jsullivan at opensourcedevel.com
>
> http://www.spiritualoutreach.com
> Making Christianity intelligible to secular society
>
> --
> Fedora-directory-users mailing list
> Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-directory-users/attachments/20090521/3b0c9eef/attachment.htm>


More information about the Fedora-directory-users mailing list