Documentation project status

[Dave Pawson]

At 23:02 28/12/2003, Edward C. Bailey wrote:

>However, the next logical step is when things start to run off the tracks.
>What's the most natural thing to do with an existing document when the
>software described in that document changes?  That's right -- modify the
>document to reflect the changes made to the software.
>
>And at *that* point we're *definitely* talking about "substantive
>modifications", so we're into prohibited territory.
>
>Bottom line -- The Red Hat Linux is not part of the Fedora project, so the
>only way to move forward wrt Fedora Core documentation is to concentrate on
>the creation of new content...

What a bloody waste.
   Are the Redhat people such a bunch of **** that they wont
allow re-use, not even when moderated by their own staff?

Can someone inside redhat raise this please?
   It *was* redhat that gave birth to Fedora.

regards DaveP