Style guide

[Karsten Wade]

On Fri, 2004-08-20 at 06:07, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> On Thu, 2004-08-19 at 21:34, Karsten Wade wrote:

> > * We don't want outside repositories or hosted draft documents to be
> > seen _at_all_ as official, supported, backed-up, unrootkitted, or
> > anything sources for FDP docs or SCM (software configuration
>         ^^^^^ other than? (not nitpicking, just making sure I
> understand.)
> > management).

Bad idiomatic usage ... it should parse like, "we don't want outside
repositories to be seen at all as official anything to do with FDP."

Still awkward.  How about:

* Because of concerns over support, availability, redundancy, and
security, we don't want non-FDP doc or source repositories to be seen as
"officially" connected to the project.  For example, if someone's SCM
gets compromised and a rootkit trojan is loaded into document tarball
... well, bad things could happen.

Hope that is clearer,

- Karsten
-- 
Karsten Wade, RHCE, Tech Writer
a lemon is just a melon in disguise
http://people.redhat.com/kwade/
gpg fingerprint: 2680 DBFD D968 3141 0115  5F1B D992 0E06 AD0E 0C41