project website link problem?

Tammy Fox tfox at redhat.com
Mon Mar 8 22:29:16 UTC 2004


On Mon, 2004-03-08 at 16:48, Tammy Fox wrote:
> On Sun, 2004-03-07 at 05:10, Dave Pawson wrote:
> > http://fedora.redhat.com/projects/docs/
> > 
> > says
> > Some other interesting Bugzilla queries:
> >     * 
> > <http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?short_desc_type=allwordssubstr&component=fedora-docs&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=MODIFIED&bug_status=NEEDINFO&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=REOPENED&bug_status=VERIFIED&bug_severity=high&bug_severity=low&bug_severity=normal&bug_severity=security&bug_severity=translation&long_desc_type=allwordssubstr&bug_file_loc_type=allwordssubstr&status_whiteboard_type=allwordssubstr&fixed_in_type=allwordssubstr&devel_whiteboard_type=allwordssubstr&keywords_type=allwords&cust_facing=YES&emailassigned_to1=1&emailtype1=exact&emailreporter2=1&emailtype2=exact&bugidtype=include&chfieldto=Now&cmdtype=doit&remaction=run&namedcmd=blank&order=Reuse+same+sort+as+last+time&field0-0-0=noop&type0-0-0=noop>All 
> > open bugs for fedora-docs
> >     * 
> > <http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?short_desc_type=allwordssubstr&component=fedora-docs&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=MODIFIED&bug_status=NEEDINFO&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=REOPENED&bug_severity=enhancement&long_desc_type=allwordssubstr&bug_file_loc_type=allwordssubstr&status_whiteboard_type=allwordssubstr&fixed_in_type=allwordssubstr&devel_whiteboard_type=allwordssubstr&keywords_type=allwords&cust_facing=YES&emailassigned_to1=1&emailtype1=exact&emailreporter2=1&emailtype2=exact&bugidtype=include&chfieldto=Now&cmdtype=doit&remaction=run&namedcmd=blank&order=Reuse+same+sort+as+last+time&field0-0-0=noop&type0-0-0=noop>The 
> > requests for enhancements (RFEs) for fedora-docs
> > 
> > I was going to use that for a request to add my word, link,
> > on the jargon-buster (now I've got it out of cvs - tks Karsten).
> > But it appears (to me) to be a link to the bug reporting page?
> > 
> > Is that as it should be?
> > Even at that page, fedora docs doesn't appear as a valid project.
> > (Am I repeating what's been already said on this list?
> > It sounds familiar)
> > 
> > regards DaveP
> 
> Well, it is supposed to be a real component. ;-) I'll submit another
> request to add it as a component. Once it actually exists, it is
> probably the best way to submit additions for the Fedora Jargon doc so
> we can keep track of them.
> 
> Tammy

OK. fedora-docs actually exists now under the Fedora Core product.

Please use it to fill bugs or RFEs against existing Fedora docs so we
can keep track of them. As they come in, I'll cc the actual maintainer.

Tammy





More information about the fedora-docs-list mailing list