Installation types

Tammy Fox tfox at redhat.com
Fri Oct 1 18:23:29 UTC 2004


On Fri, 2004-10-01 at 12:25, Tammy Fox wrote:
> On Fri, 2004-10-01 at 09:25, Stuart Ellis wrote:
> > > Stuart, I'm not sure what the future of that particular issue is, but I
> > > remember a time in the Red Hat Linux days when the partition layout
> > > *did* change depending on the installation type, and I assume it could
> > > conceivably be that way in the future. This may be a subject you should
> > > direct to the anaconda-devel list, to get input from the developers
> > > themselves. Does anyone else have a suggestion?
> > > 
> > > -- 
> > > Paul W. Frields, RHCE
> > > 
> > 
> > I remember this as well, which is why I'm a bit puzzled.  On the other
> > hand I didn't use RH8 or RH9 at all, and it's possible that I've just
> > missed something that changed along the way.  So I thought I'd post here
> > first in case it was a documented change or well-known issue.
> > --
> > Stuart Ellis
> s.ellis at fastmail.co.uk
> 
> Yes. That used to be the case in RHL. Let me ask around and see if I can
> find out what it is supposed to do now. I'll get back to you.
> 
> Tammy

I just confirmed with Jeremy Katz that the partitions created are the
same for all installation types. So, we can remove that phrase from the
IG.

Tammy




More information about the fedora-docs-list mailing list