Trackers obsolete?

[Stuart Ellis]

On Sun, 2005-08-21 at 17:50 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> Now that we have our own product and components for docs, it seems to me
> that the "per-document" trackers, such as:
> 
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=ig-traqr
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=fdp-docguide-traqr
> 
> ...have been rendered obsolete.  I still like the idea of keeping the
> tracker bugs for ideas and works-in-progress, although I suspect they
> will be ignored in favor of the Wiki. (*sigh*)  Comments?

Yes, they're probably now redundant, but I don't actually see that as a
bad thing - specific issues can obviously get individual bug numbers,
more general discussion and review is probably better done here on list
where it's visible. Material on the Wiki is also much more broadly
visible and accessible in a way that Bugzilla isn't in practice.

One other thing I find that I like about Wiki over Bugzilla is that you
can update and *delete*, whereas Bugzilla comments clutter up the
tracker bug forever.

-- 

Stuart Ellis

stuart at elsn.org

Fedora Documentation Project: http://fedora.redhat.com/projects/docs/

GPG key ID: 7098ABEA
GPG key fingerprint: 68B0 E291 FB19 C845 E60E  9569 292E E365 7098 ABEA 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-docs-list/attachments/20050821/451f79c5/attachment.sig>