[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: new bugzilla status for FDP



On Wed, 2005-07-13 at 07:49 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-07-12 at 23:02 -0700, Karsten Wade wrote:
> > Because we are getting so many individual guides and projects to track,
> > it made sense to move our bugzilla work into a separate Product category
> > in bugzilla.
> > 
> > Now, when you are entering a new bug report[1] or from within an
> > existing bug, you can choose Fedora Documentation as the Product.  This
> > is a dropdown menu within the bug report.  Then, each guide has an
> > individual Component.
> > 
> > Bug reports are automatically filled with initial owner and QA contact,
> > as well as Cc: list.  This helps us receive, sort, and manage bug
> > reports more easily.  It also raises the visibility of the Documentation
> > Project as a peer within the Fedora Project community.
> 
> Found a TinyURL on the wiki that should change:
> 
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject/ReleaseNotes/Beats:
>   http://tinyurl.com/exov3
> 
> I could generate a new TinyURL, but I'm wondering why the one that's
> there links to a bug entry that "hard-codes" Fedora Core as the Product.
> Hit that link and you'll see what I mean.  Is this a function of the
> relnotes fedoraproject org ownership?  If so, anyone with a clue who
> could fix that, um, should.  :-)

Never mind, answered my own question.  I didn't read far enough in the
URL to see the product name.  I will change this shortly.

-- 
Paul W. Frields, RHCE                          http://paul.frields.org/
  gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233  5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
 Fedora Documentation Project: http://fedora.redhat.com/projects/docs/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]