[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Proposal for document entities



On Sat, 2005-11-19 at 11:10 +0000, Stuart Ellis wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-11-18 at 15:34 -0500, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> > I would like to see this instead as a standard:
> > 
> > <!ENTITY BOOKNAME "foo-tutorial">
> > <!ENTITY BOOKVERSION "0.15"> <!-- change version number here -->
> > <!ENTITY BOOKDATE "2005-01-01"> <!-- change revision date here -->
> > <!ENTITY BOOKID "&BOOKNAME;-&BOOKVERSION; (&BOOKDATE;)">
> > <!ENTITY BUG-NUM "000000"> <!-- only used while in draft -->
> 
> Another +1.
> 
> I'd prefer "DOC*", over "BOOK*" for these, just because documents may
> all not be Guides, and most of the end-products are on-line, rather than
> specifically for printing.

Excellent point.

-- 
Paul W. Frields, RHCE                          http://paul.frields.org/
  gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233  5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
 Fedora Documentation Project: http://fedora.redhat.com/projects/docs/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]