[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Proposal for document entities



On Sat, 2005-11-19 at 10:29 -0500, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> On Sat, 2005-11-19 at 11:10 +0000, Stuart Ellis wrote:
> > On Fri, 2005-11-18 at 15:34 -0500, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> > > I would like to see this instead as a standard:
> > > 
> > > <!ENTITY BOOKNAME "foo-tutorial">
> > > <!ENTITY BOOKVERSION "0.15"> <!-- change version number here -->
> > > <!ENTITY BOOKDATE "2005-01-01"> <!-- change revision date here -->
> > > <!ENTITY BOOKID "&BOOKNAME;-&BOOKVERSION; (&BOOKDATE;)">
> > > <!ENTITY BUG-NUM "000000"> <!-- only used while in draft -->
> > 
> > Another +1.
> > 
> > I'd prefer "DOC*", over "BOOK*" for these, just because documents may
> > all not be Guides, and most of the end-products are on-line, rather than
> > specifically for printing.
> 
> Excellent point.

+1

-- 
Karsten Wade, RHCE * Sr. Tech Writer * http://people.redhat.com/kwade/
gpg fingerprint:  2680 DBFD D968 3141 0115    5F1B D992 0E06 AD0E 0C41   
Content Services                          Fedora Documentation Project
http://www.redhat.com/docs   http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]