[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Proposal for document entities



On Sun, 2005-11-20 at 21:38 -0800, Karsten Wade wrote:
> > > > <!ENTITY BOOKNAME "foo-tutorial">
> > > > <!ENTITY BOOKVERSION "0.15"> <!-- change version number here -->
> > > > <!ENTITY BOOKDATE "2005-01-01"> <!-- change revision date here -->
> > > > <!ENTITY BOOKID "&BOOKNAME;-&BOOKVERSION; (&BOOKDATE;)">
> > > > <!ENTITY BUG-NUM "000000"> <!-- only used while in draft -->
> > > 
> > > Another +1.
> > > 
> > > I'd prefer "DOC*", over "BOOK*" for these, just because documents may
> > > all not be Guides, and most of the end-products are on-line, rather than
> > > specifically for printing.
> > 
> > Excellent point.
> 
> +1

OK, this will break some docs when we put this change in, since
docs-common/common/{legalnotice,bugreporting}-*.xml are tied to BOOKID.
I don't mind changing all these to use DOCID, and I'll even do a mass
replacement of BOOKID in existing docs, as long as no one objects.
Speak now, Docs Mobb!

-- 
Paul W. Frields, RHCE                          http://paul.frields.org/
  gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233  5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
 Fedora Documentation Project: http://fedora.redhat.com/projects/docs/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]