[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [RFC] Packaging technology update

On Sun, 2005-11-27 at 09:40 -0600, Tommy Reynolds wrote:
> Uttered "Paul W. Frields" <stickster gmail com>, spake thus:
> > On the other hand, a RPM %changelog often has more than one
> > explanatory line for details.  I will try my hand at this one if
> > you agree, since I don't want to try your patience, and since I
> > want to see if I understand the concept well enough to DIY.  (DIM?)
> Go ahead and welcome.  I just didn't have time to investigate line
> wrapping the %changelog entries, but I'd be happy for your to take a
> swing.
> > I suppose, thanks to your display of XML skillz, we can even validate
> > this info during the build process to make sure nothing breaks!  Sweet.
> BTW, order matters in the %changelog entries.  I always take the
> version and release numbers from the very first <revision> element.
> That's why there is that mandatory, only-one-alternative "ordered="
> attribute; it's really documentation.

Cool, that means I grokked it right.  Although that means revision
histories will be written differently than they are now, that's not a
problem.  DocBook doesn't mandate an order for them, so any way we want
to do them is acceptable.

Paul W. Frields, RHCE                          http://paul.frields.org/
  gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233  5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
 Fedora Documentation Project: http://fedora.redhat.com/projects/docs/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]