[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [RFC] Packaging technology update



Uttered "Paul W. Frields" <stickster gmail com>, spake thus:

> Although that means revision histories will be written differently
> than they are now, that's not a problem.  DocBook doesn't mandate
> an order for them, so any way we want to do them is acceptable.

Well, we can output the changelog in any order we choose.  Instead of
an <xsl:for-each> construct, something along the lines of
"blah/blah/revision[count()-position()]" could reverse the order.

I figured that nicety could wait.

Cheers

Attachment: pgp5xrTgFONOZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]