[RFC] Packaging technology update

Paul W. Frields stickster at gmail.com
Sun Nov 27 17:42:54 UTC 2005


On Sun, 2005-11-27 at 09:56 -0600, Tommy Reynolds wrote:
> Uttered "Paul W. Frields" <stickster at gmail.com>, spake thus:
> 
> > Although that means revision histories will be written differently
> > than they are now, that's not a problem.  DocBook doesn't mandate
> > an order for them, so any way we want to do them is acceptable.
> 
> Well, we can output the changelog in any order we choose.  Instead of
> an <xsl:for-each> construct, something along the lines of
> "blah/blah/revision[count()-position()]" could reverse the order.
> 
> I figured that nicety could wait.

Yeah, I'm starting to realize the more reading I do that XSLT is pretty
danged powerful.  And yes, I am in fact late to the party, as usual. ;-D

-- 
Paul W. Frields, RHCE                          http://paul.frields.org/
  gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233  5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
 Fedora Documentation Project: http://fedora.redhat.com/projects/docs/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-docs-list/attachments/20051127/f3acbe06/attachment.sig>


More information about the fedora-docs-list mailing list