[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [RFC] Packaging technology update



On Sun, 2005-11-27 at 09:56 -0600, Tommy Reynolds wrote:
> Uttered "Paul W. Frields" <stickster gmail com>, spake thus:
> 
> > Although that means revision histories will be written differently
> > than they are now, that's not a problem.  DocBook doesn't mandate
> > an order for them, so any way we want to do them is acceptable.
> 
> Well, we can output the changelog in any order we choose.  Instead of
> an <xsl:for-each> construct, something along the lines of
> "blah/blah/revision[count()-position()]" could reverse the order.
> 
> I figured that nicety could wait.

Yeah, I'm starting to realize the more reading I do that XSLT is pretty
danged powerful.  And yes, I am in fact late to the party, as usual. ;-D

-- 
Paul W. Frields, RHCE                          http://paul.frields.org/
  gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233  5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
 Fedora Documentation Project: http://fedora.redhat.com/projects/docs/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]