[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: {RFC] XSLT for draft watermarking?

On Wed, 2005-11-30 at 11:41 -0600, Tommy Reynolds wrote:

> Documents built locally from CVS can never be "production" because
> they are not official copies.  To emphasis this, we now have a
> watermark indicating its draft status.
> Documents obtained from DocsRawHide can never be "production" and
> need to be watermarked as draft.

> We really need only one CSS stylesheet in the docs CVS: the
> fedora-draft.css file, and we have that.
> Any official-looking document renderings should come from whom ever
> is constructing the official-looking release, but anything in our CVS
> is strictly for draft documents.

I agree. This is in line with the general trademark policy, too (people
can freely copy, modify, and then rebrand, but not pass off modified
copies as an "official Fedora" product).


Stuart Ellis

stuart elsn org

Fedora Documentation Project: http://fedora.redhat.com/projects/docs/

GPG key ID: 7098ABEA
GPG key fingerprint: 68B0 E291 FB19 C845 E60E  9569 292E E365 7098 ABEA

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]