Test of Docs Packaging

[Paul W. Frields]

On Fri, 2005-10-14 at 18:03 -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
> I'd love it if FC5 out of the box had a good contents page there, with
> some initial description of what Fedora is, and how to get involved,
> perhaps followed by top-level categories for end-user documentation, and
> sysadmin documentation.  The various DocBook XML files could be hooked
> in there somehow...
> 
> There's a bug to cover this here:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=170847
> 
> Would it be useful for this mailing list to come up with a scheme for
> what ought to be displayed on the front page of Yelp, and we can take it
> from there?

While I would *love* it if we could do this, the fact remains that
Fedora developers are committed to sticking closer to upstream GNOME on
this issue.  If they choose to deviate on this front, I for one will be
overjoyed!  Right now our docs get added to "Other Documentation"
because Yelp has no way to drop in a modular reconfiguration of the .cl
(contents list), AFAIK.

-- 
Paul W. Frields, RHCE                          http://paul.frields.org/
  gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233  5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
 Fedora Documentation Project: http://fedora.redhat.com/projects/docs/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-docs-list/attachments/20051015/34f7ed85/attachment.sig>