<command> vs <application>
Karsten Wade
kwade at redhat.com
Thu Sep 8 17:44:42 UTC 2005
On Thu, 2005-09-08 at 10:51 -0400, Brad Smith wrote:
> <para>
> <command>links</command> is an unusual web
> browser in that, unlike graphical browsers such as
> <application>Firefox</application>, it is run
> from the command-line with an instruction like
> <command>links http://fedora.redhat.com</command>.
> </para>
>
> I can understand why we might want to differentiate between commands the
> user might run and commands that are just being mentioned (my initial
> assumption), but the official definition, which requires a different tag
> for links and Firefox when mentioned in the same context, seems
> arbitrary and kind of silly.
The difference is, <application>Firefox</application> is the GUI app,
while the command <command>firefox</command> uses the script at
<filename>/usr/bin/firefox</filename> to run the <command>firefox-
bin</command> binary.
Does that make sense? I'm pretty sure that is what the DocBook
committee meant.
:-D - Karsten
--
Karsten Wade, RHCE * Sr. Tech Writer * http://people.redhat.com/kwade/
gpg fingerprint: 2680 DBFD D968 3141 0115 5F1B D992 0E06 AD0E 0C41
Red Hat SELinux Guide
http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/enterprise/RHEL-4-Manual/selinux-guide/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-docs-list/attachments/20050908/a2416b63/attachment.sig>
More information about the fedora-docs-list
mailing list