Admin Guide / Accounts - call for feedback

[Paul W. Frields]

On Mon, 2006-12-11 at 12:52 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Vladimir Kosovac wrote:
> > Greetings, Motley Crew!
> > 
> > I have couple of sandboxed pages ready for your review/input at:
> > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/wiki/VladimirKosovac/StylingPage/WorkPage
> > 
> > As Karsten suggested, probably easier to review smaller chunks - thus
> > this call. Of course, all suggestions are welcome and appreciated.
> 
> I would like to see how this section fits into the bigger guide. So 
> using the drafts space seems to be better. Do we follow the style of 
> exposing path and binary names anywhere as compared to highlighting the 
> menu entries in the desktop? This section would be good as a reference. 
> However a guide should cover tools from the administrative view point 
> and not just lump all the system-config* tools in a single page.
> 
> For example, if I am doing web services administration, I would expect 
> to learn about system-config-httpd in that section along with the Apache 
> configuration details.

That's an excellent point Rahul makes -- that our documentation should
be largely task-based.  Relevant material should be lumped together
where possible and logical.

-- 
Paul W. Frields, RHCE                          http://paul.frields.org/
  gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233  5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
       Fedora Project Board: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Board
    Fedora Docs Project:  http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-docs-list/attachments/20061212/1ed4d7f8/attachment.sig>