[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: fdp-info-*.xml a generated file?

On Sat, 2006-02-11 at 07:05 -0800, Karsten Wade wrote:
> If fdp-info-*.xml is a generated file (right?) should we -not- check a
> version into CVS?  When the rpm-info.xml is present, the fdp-info file
> is created from that, right?

BTW, I ask because make(1) is complaining about the rpm-info-en.xml file

make html
make: *** No rule to make target
info-en.xml', needed by `en/fdp-info-en.xml'.  Stop.

The file is not in the repo:

cvs up -d en/rpm-info-en.xml
cvs update: nothing known about en/rpm-info-en.xml

I copied over the Italian version (my best chance of translating back,
as it's closest to Spanish).  I figure that this was just a slip in the
process of moving files around, just want to make sure I'm not missing

- Karsten
Karsten Wade, RHCE * Sr. Tech Writer * http://people.redhat.com/kwade/
gpg fingerprint:  2680 DBFD D968 3141 0115    5F1B D992 0E06 AD0E 0C41   
Content Services                          Fedora Documentation Project
http://www.redhat.com/docs   http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]