testing my pgp/introducing myself
Karsten Wade
kwade at redhat.com
Fri May 5 02:59:28 UTC 2006
On Thu, 2006-05-04 at 19:15 -0500, Patrick W. Barnes wrote:
> It worked well. To avoid the warning, one simply needs to grab the public key
> from pgp.mit.edu, which is the expected behavior. :-)
I guess I'm hoping for something easier than that. I wish the GPG
support was smoother in all cases. I really dig Evolution's signing and
encryption, but they all require a separate downloading of the public
key. Lazy factor.
Missed opportunity at the last FUDCon for a keysigning. Why don't we
care about those anymore? Don't we need a strong web of trust for
Fedora keys to mean anything themselves?
Is there any way we can do keysigning parties not in person? For
example ...
Okay, I started to write out a process that included pictures of
ourselves signed and encrypted and verified ... and it was crazier than
ever.
Anyone want to start a Fedora Keys SIG that works to get _everyone_ to
pause for a keysigning wherever two Fedorans meet in the meat?
- Karsten, aka AD0E0C41
--
Karsten Wade, RHCE * Sr. Editor * http://people.redhat.com/kwade/
gpg fingerprint: 2680 DBFD D968 3141 0115 5F1B D992 0E06 AD0E 0C41
Fedora Documentation Project http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject
Learn. Network. Experience open source.
Red Hat Summit Nashville | May 30 - June 2, 2006
Learn more: http://www.redhat.com/promo/summit/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-docs-list/attachments/20060504/dfae9e8e/attachment.sig>
More information about the fedora-docs-list
mailing list