Firefox splash page tracker
Sam Folk-Williams
samfw at redhat.com
Tue Oct 3 20:16:19 UTC 2006
On Tue, 2006-10-03 at 14:52 -0400, Greg DeKoenigsberg wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Oct 2006, Sam Folk-Williams wrote:
>
> > I guess my question is, how could this have happened? How could nothing
> > have been gathered in all this time? Also, why did this just now become
> > an urgent thing?
>
> Just because it's a new problem to you doesn't mean that it's a new
> problem. It just means that it's a new problem to you.
>
Point taken. The reason for my question is that it came to the list as a
last minute thing.
>
> It's worth pointing out at this point that we also had a great idea for
> FC4 *and* FC5 -- redirecting yum requests through bouncer and collecting
> stats that way. But we didn't execute. Why? Because it wasn't judged to
> be important enough to expend resources to *make* it happen.
>
This is definitely worth pointing out...
> It's all about execution. We do what we have with what we've got. Ideas
> and promises are great, but they don't feed the bulldog. And when we ask
> for MORE FUNDING TO MAKE FEDORA BETTER, and the Powers That Be ask, "well,
> how many Fedora users do you have?" and we have NO ANSWER, that is BAD FOR
> FEDORA. BAAAAAAAD.
>
Understood.
>
> It's certainly much better than what we have right now, which is
> *literally nothing at all*. How many times do we have to reiterate this
> point?
>
I get it. I think there's value to looking at things like traffic to
fp.o, registered users on fedoraforums, etc. But I should have taken
into account that you have already looked into all that.
> > Why don't we start to prepare some kind of survey of people who are
> > registered at various fedora-related sites now? I don't know that it has
> > to correspond with a release.
>
> I guess I don't understand what makes you think that survey data will be
> anywhere near as accurate.
>
I think it's generally accepted that surveys are a good and useful tool.
> I mean, here's some simple back-of-the-envelope calculations:
>
> How many people who install Fedora actually join a Fedora mailing list, or
> go to a Fedora website? 20 percent? 5 percent? On the other hand: how
> many Fedora Desktop users open a browser? 75 percent? 90 percent?
>
> > On the other hand, if you really think this idea will give you data you
> > can trust and urgently need, it might well be worth it to go ahead. I
> > just personally think this feels a bit cobbled together.
>
> We had great, large plans, as early as FC4. Grand plans. Beautiful
> plans. What happened? We did not execute.
>
Ok, with that in mind...
> Therefore, we dropped back to the *simplest possible plan* that would give
> us *any data at all*.
>
I'd say go for it. You have definitely showed me that this was not a
last minute thing, which is the impression that I had. Given everything
that has happened it sounds to me like if you don't do this nothing will
ever happen. Which means, DO IT!
Thanks for elaborating.
Sam
> --g
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> Greg DeKoenigsberg || Fedora Project || fedoraproject.org
> Be an Ambassador || http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Ambassadors
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
--
Sam Folk-Williams, RHCE
Global Support Services
More information about the fedora-docs-list
mailing list