[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Fragmentation in Linux Documentation?

On Fri, 2007-04-20 at 07:33 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Karsten Wade wrote:
> > OTOH, Spot (and others) have reminded me that the differences between
> > distros outweigh the similarities.
> That is not a problem for some of the documentation like basic server 
> side sys administration guides.

We'd still need a full analysis to see if it was worth it.  It could be
that 20% or 50% or 80% of the content could be shared.

> > Maybe ... maybe we need to coordinate with other distros to put a common
> > front-end on TLDP to allow us all to update it, and use it as a common
> > docbase?  We can use any content that is GPL, afaik, although it's not
> > our preferred license for documentation.  The majority of TLDP is still
> > GPL, right?
> GPL? You mean GNU FDL. TLDP licensing is a bit of mess but I would guess 
> that the important docs are under GNU FDL which I believe is 
> incompatible with Open Publication License.

:( Bummer ...


Because authors retain copyright and choose their own license, there
isn't going to be a way that e.g. LDP could multi-license content.  So
that pretty much lets us out of the running.

FWIW, I'm glad.  I don't like the GNU FDL.  It's a PITA to administrate,
I believe the lawyers who tell me it doesn't give enough protection, and
it definitely seems contradictory to the GPL.  It's too bad the CC BY-SA
doesn't include warranty protection ...

- Karsten
   Karsten Wade, 108 Editor       ^     Fedora Documentation Project 
 Sr. Developer Relations Mgr.     |  fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject
   quaid.108.redhat.com           |          gpg key: AD0E0C41
////////////////////////////////// \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]