PDF format guides
Karsten Wade
kwade at redhat.com
Sat Mar 3 17:42:46 UTC 2007
On Sat, 2007-03-03 at 09:48 -0500, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> I am a bit dismayed at the fact that there seem to be gazillions of ways
> to produce PDFs, but no one has invested time in getting DocBook to use
> them. Apparently "laziness" trumps "hubris" in this case.¹ I'd bet
> this project warrants a GSoC pitch, since it would benefit pretty much
> the entire FOSS community and not just Fedora.
+1
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FedoraBounties#DocBook2PDF
I've received two contacts regarding our man page bounty on there for
GSoC and similar SoC projects. Seems like a good idea to put our
request out front.
/me files separate thought on getting some early exposure value by
hyping Fedora GSoC-worthy projects *immediately*
--
Karsten Wade, RHCE, 108 Editor ^ Fedora Documentation Project
Sr. Developer Relations Mgr. | fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject
quaid.108.redhat.com | gpg key: AD0E0C41
////////////////////////////////// \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-docs-list/attachments/20070303/67c87d05/attachment.sig>
More information about the fedora-docs-list
mailing list