Packaging Guidelines Organization

[Eric Christensen]

What needs to happen with the Packaging Guide?  Is there something
already there that needs some attention?

Eric



On Mon, 2008-12-15 at 11:23 -0800, Karsten Wade wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 11:15:20PM -0600, Ian Weller wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 09:50:22AM -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> > > Howdy folks,
> > > 
> > I moved this thread to fedora-wiki at lists.fedoraproject.org. It'd be
> > preferred that all discussion stays there :)
> 
> Sorry I missed this one in my reply.
> 
> I'm not sure this should move to the wiki list.  The Packaging Guide
> is probably not destined for a wiki-only existence because:
> 
> * The content needs to be immutable for people outside of the
>   Packaging Committee (and writing team).  This is one of the reasons
>   we want a CMS for publishing.
> 
> * We really need to make the Packaging Guide available for
>   translation.  For the foreseeable future, the wiki l10n process is
>   the one oddity in an otherwise PO-using/Transifex-submitting system.
> 
> Anyway, that's my perspective on things.
> 
> Regardless, we really, really need a single lead writer for this one.
> 
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Docs_Project_content_tasks_for_experienced_contributors#Packaging_Guide_-_lead_writer
> 
> If we don't get a lead writer, we basically have to tell the FPC et
> al, "Sorry."
> 
> - Karsten
> -- 
> fedora-docs-list mailing list
> fedora-docs-list at redhat.com
> To unsubscribe: 
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-docs-list/attachments/20081215/bd697374/attachment.sig>