[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

[Fwd: Re: GPG Keysigning at FUDCon]

Would it make sense to change our docs to refer to subkeys.pgp.net instead of MIT?

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: GPG Keysigning at FUDCon
Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 13:43:54 -0500
From: Todd Zullinger <tmz pobox com>
Reply-To: Development discussions related to Fedora <fedora-devel-list redhat com>
To: fedora-devel-list redhat com
References: <20071212214010 GA20896 auslistsprd01 us dell com> <477C3AA7 9010700 redhat com> <1199353983 13378 1 camel rousalka dyndns org> <477D1646 6080207 redhat com>

John Poelstra wrote:
I looked into it more and changed the expiration by:

1) gpg --edit <key> and then option "expire"
2) gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --send-keys <key> to make change

FWIW, you may want to send that to subkeys.pgp.net, which is where
Matt plans to pull the keys from for the key signing.  This is the
default keyserver in recent gnupg releases.  I think that there is a
sync between pgp.mit.edu and subkeys.pgp.net, but I'm not positive.

The gnupg default is subkeys.pgp.net because pgp.mit.edu runs ancient
keyserver software that has many known problems (it ignores photo
packets, can munge up multiple subkeys, and other annoyances).

Todd        OpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp
I do nothing, granted. But I see the hours pass - which is better than
trying to fill them.
    -- E. M. Cioran

Attachment: file:///tmp/nsmail-1.tmp
Description: PGP signature

fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list redhat com

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]