Would it make sense to change our docs to refer to subkeys.pgp.net instead of MIT?
John -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: GPG Keysigning at FUDCon Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 13:43:54 -0500 From: Todd Zullinger <tmz pobox com>Reply-To: Development discussions related to Fedora <fedora-devel-list redhat com>
To: fedora-devel-list redhat comReferences: <20071212214010 GA20896 auslistsprd01 us dell com> <477C3AA7 9010700 redhat com> <1199353983 13378 1 camel rousalka dyndns org> <477D1646 6080207 redhat com>
John Poelstra wrote:
I looked into it more and changed the expiration by: 1) gpg --edit <key> and then option "expire" 2) gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --send-keys <key> to make change public
FWIW, you may want to send that to subkeys.pgp.net, which is where Matt plans to pull the keys from for the key signing. This is the default keyserver in recent gnupg releases. I think that there is a sync between pgp.mit.edu and subkeys.pgp.net, but I'm not positive. The gnupg default is subkeys.pgp.net because pgp.mit.edu runs ancient keyserver software that has many known problems (it ignores photo packets, can munge up multiple subkeys, and other annoyances). -- Todd OpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ I do nothing, granted. But I see the hours pass - which is better than trying to fill them. -- E. M. Cioran
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list redhat com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list