[Fwd: Re: GPG Keysigning at FUDCon]

[Paul W. Frields]

On Thu, 2008-01-03 at 10:49 -0800, John Poelstra wrote:
> Would it make sense to change our docs to refer to subkeys.pgp.net 
> instead of MIT?

It would, if the recommended GUI tools defaulted to subkeys.pgp.net as
well.  Otherwise there's somewhat of a logical disconnect.  I see that
the current maintainer of Seahorse may be running up against -ENOTIME.

-- 
Paul W. Frields, RHCE                          http://paul.frields.org/
  gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233  5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
           Fedora Project: http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
  irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-docs-list/attachments/20080103/08c10f8c/attachment.sig>