Bullet-proof method of asking upstream for clarification?

[Paul W. Frields]

On Fri, 2008-07-25 at 13:43 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-07-25 at 07:24 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 02:21:56PM +0900, Jared Smith wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2008-07-24 at 09:20 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> > > > It would be nice if some non-English speakers on this list would look at
> > > > it.  Then post to the list here to tell me if any of the text rubs you
> > > > the wrong way! :-)
> > > 
> > > Well, I wouldn't go so far as to call myself a non-English speaker, but
> > > it might be good to include a link to Fedora's licensing policy, so that
> > > if nothing else, this can be an educational experience for the person
> > > receiving an email such as this.
> > 
> > Your wish is my command -- so added! ;-)
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Pfrields/DraftUpstreamRequestEmail
> 
> I'm obviously a bad person to comment on, since my messages often go
> through as "undiplomatic", but can you add a line about adding a
> detached text license file in the same archive as the font files?

Added a bullet for this, thanks!

-- 
Paul W. Frields
  gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233  5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
  http://paul.frields.org/   -  -   http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
  irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-docs-list/attachments/20080725/9a175919/attachment.sig>