That won't drive me away. As I said, I'm trying to figure out the lay
of the land here. Now I take it there is some documentation that is
considered Fedora documentation while other documentation is from other
organizations. I guess I presumed if it was accessible from "fedora"
via yum, it was considered Fedora documentation.|
Thanks for the insight.
Sulyok Peti wrote:
2008. 06. 18, szerda keltezéssel 22.38-kor Chris Carlson ezt írta:Given this background, I thought I could be of some use to the Fedora documentation project. I'm not sure how much time I'll have, but I want to help. I've already found a minor typo in the documentation for glXIntro. The example program sets an attribute to GLX_DOUBLE_BUFFER, but the symbol doesn't exist; it's now called GLX_DOUBLEBUFFER.I do not want to drive you away, but this problem is not a Fedora Docs issue. If you type$ rpm -qif /usr/share/man/man3/glXIntro.3gl.gz Name : mesa-libGL-devel Relocations: (not relocatable) Version : 7.1 Vendor: Fedora Project Release : 0.31.fc9 Build Date: 2008. máj. 10., szombat, 07.43.18 CEST Install Date: 2008. máj. 30., péntek, 18.39.24 CEST Build Host: xenbuilder2.fedora.redhat.com Group : Development/Libraries Source RPM: mesa-7.1-0.31.fc9.src.rpm Size : 938090 License: MIT Signature : DSA/SHA1, 2008. máj. 28., szerda, 13.32.44 CEST, Key ID b44269d04f2a6fd2 Packager : Fedora Project URL : http://www.mesa3d.org Summary : Mesa libGL development package <<<<<<<<<< So this doc belongs to http://www.mesa3d.org