[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: GCC and Eclipse beats hashed out



Hm, there shouldn't have been.  I think those were hashed out because in
the XML, everything under Devel/ becomes part of the Devel.xml file, so
there's no sense in tracking them all separately while we were working
on editing the beats together.  Are those changes in the XML now?

Paul

On Wed, 2008-05-07 at 09:24 +1000, Murray McAllister wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Docs/BeatStatus, are there any
> reasons for the following being hashed out:
> 
> ##|| [:Docs/Beats/Devel/Tools/GCC]
> ##|| [:Docs/Beats/Devel/Tools/Eclipse]
> 
> There were quite a few changes missing for the Eclipse section in the
> GA release notes...
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Murray.
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> pub   1024D/81B3FDEB 2007-09-19 [expires: 2008-09-18]
> Key fingerprint = 4ED9 9907 5BF0 4132 2B46  20D1 C0C6 362D 81B3 FDEB
> Murray McAllister (Fedora Docs Project / mdious) <murray mcallister gmail com>
> sub   2048g/B04CFA0C 2007-09-19 [expires: 2008-09-18]
> 
-- 
Paul W. Frields                                http://paul.frields.org/
  gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233  5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
  http://redhat.com/   -  -  -  -   http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
  irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]