[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: docs beat format

On Tue, 2008-09-09 at 11:16 -0400, John J. McDonough wrote:
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Paul W. Frields" <stickster gmail com>
> To: "For participants of the Documentation Project" 
> <fedora-docs-list redhat com>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2008 10:09 AM
> Subject: Re: docs beat format
> > I think we ought to solve these transparently in
> > the back end rather than inflicting weird hacky
> > requirements on the wiki where we want more people
> > contributing.
> I agree we should probably avoid "weird hacky rquirements" but I don't think 
> we have to totally discard the need for some simple, well-publicised 
> conventions.

Since I'm one of the folks who was involved in said weird hacky
requirements previously, note that wasn't directed at other people.  In
other words, I'm trying to learn from a previous mistake. ;-)

We do have conventions on the wiki:

Paul W. Frields
  gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233  5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
  http://paul.frields.org/   -  -   http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
  irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]