[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Licensing directions for Fedora content

On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 03:30:26AM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Paul W. Frields wrote:
> > We should not make this effort without communicating with our
> > compatriots in Red Hat Documentation.  They moved to the OPL to match
> > our requirements so it would only be fair to coordinate with them.
> IIRC this change was driven by Red Hat Legal.  What does Red Hat legal
> say now?

As I said separately, the original drive was to match up with Red
Hat's licensing.  Spot said RHT Legal would prefer us to use the
CC-BY-SA, which is welcome news to me.  Let's hear back from Spot on
this question for Legal:

  "Is there any reason Fedora Documentation cannot dual-license or
  relicense all Fedora content including the wiki and
  fedoraproject.org under the CC-BY-SA?"

- Karsten
Karsten 'quaid' Wade, Community Gardener

Attachment: pgpxcWMHEh9u8.pgp
Description: PGP signature

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]