Updated script

[Ruediger Landmann]

John J. McDonough wrote:
> The package that went to RC has the offending paragraph commented 
> out.  We still have absolutely no clue what is going on there.  We 
> need someone a lot more knowledgable about Publican (hint, hint) to 
> help sort it out.  As I said, I pushed the version of I18n.xml that 
> has the offending paragraph (and I mean XML paragraph here, from 
> <para> to </para>, it is actually a table) commented out.  
> Uncommenting it and generating html in any non-English language should 
> expose the problem.  Because of the need to merge the po's, it might 
> be easier to do this from the srpm than from git.  It will certainly 
> be quicker as the po merge takes some time.
>

Fixed by changing the single quotation marks to double quotation marks 
in the <table> and <tgroup> tags; but I have no idea why...