actions to OPL

[Stuart Ellis]

On Tue, 2006-02-07 at 16:13 -0800, Karsten Wade wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-02-08 at 00:00 +0000, Stuart Ellis wrote:
> 
> > Sorry to keep harping on about communication, but there is a track
> > record of stuff being done without enough communication, and causing
> > unnecessary confusion, misunderstanding, and ill-feeling. I'd like to
> > avoid all that, if it can be done.
> 
> You are right.
> 
> How are these steps now?
> 
> http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject/Licensing/StepsToOPL

It seems OK to me. IANAL, I-just-do-computers, etc. 

> I am about to ask for a vetting from the Foundation board et al.  I want
> their input on the FAQ -before- we make it widely known.
> 
> One reason we are doing this discussion on IRC with logs and first here
> is to start the attention small, but grow it rapidly.  It's working so
> far, I'm feeling almost ready to face the f-docs-l with this. :)

Cool. One of the Ubuntu Docs leads posted a link to the Fedora Weekly
Report on their mailing list last week (MoinMoin > DocBook), so stuff
like this is being read by at least a few people...

-- 

Stuart Ellis

stuart at elsn.org

Fedora Documentation Project: http://fedora.redhat.com/projects/docs/

GPG key ID: 7098ABEA
GPG key fingerprint: 68B0 E291 FB19 C845 E60E  9569 292E E365 7098 ABEA
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-dsco-list/attachments/20060208/25409591/attachment.sig>